References

  • Adamic, L. (1999). The small world Web. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Digital Libraries. Lecture notes in Computer Science. New York, Springer: 443-452.
  • Ahrweiler, P. and N. Gilbert (1998). Computer Simulations in Science and Technology Studies. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer Verlag.
  • Albert, R. and A. L. Barabasi (2002). “Statistical mechanics of complex networks.” Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1): 47-97.
  • Almind, T. and P. Ingwersen (1997). “Informetric Analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological Approaches to “Webometrics”.” Journal of Documentation 53: 404-426.
  • Ang, I. and E. Cassity (2004). Attraction of Strangers. Partnerships in Humanities Research. Sydney, Australian Academy of the Humanities.
  • Arzberger, P., P. Schröder, et al. (2004). “SCIENCE AND GOVERNMENT: An International Framework to Promote Access to Data.”Science 303(5665): 1777-1778.
  • Banks, J., Ed. (1998). Handbook of Simulation. New York et al., John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beaulieu, A. (2003). Research woes and new data flows. Promise and practice in data sharing. P. Wouters and P. Schröder. Amsterdam, NIWI-KNAW: 96.
  • Beaulieu, A. (2004). “From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
  • Beaulieu, A. (2004). “Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet.”Social Epistemology 18(2-3): 139-164.
  • Beaulieu, A. (forthcoming 2005). Sociable Hyperlinks: an ethnographic approach to connectivity. Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. C. Hine.
  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham, SHRE & Open University Press.
  • Berman, F., G. Fox, et al. (2003). The Grid: past, present, future. Grid Computing. Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality. F. Berman, G. Fox and T. Hey. Chichester, West-Sussex, UK, John Wiley & Sons: 9-50.
  • Bijker, W. and B. Peperkamp (2002). Geëngageerde geesteswetenschappen. Perspectieven op cultuurveranderingen in een digitaliserend tijdperk. Den Haag, Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps- en Technologiebeleid.
  • Bijker, W., K. Schurer, et al. (2003). Building the KNAW International Research Institute on e-Science Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences (IRISS). Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  • Björneborn, L. and P. Ingwersen (2001). “Perspectives of webometrics.” Scientometrics 50(1): 65-82.
    Boonstra, O., L. Breure, et al. (2004). Past, Present and Future of Historical Information Science, NIWI-KNAW, Amsterdam
  • Boudourides, M. A., B. Sigrist, et al. (1999). Webometrics and the Self-Organization of the European Information Society.
  • Bowker, G. C. and S. L. Star (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • Burenhult, G., Ed. (2002). Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope CAA2001. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. BAR International Series 1016. Oxford, Archeopress.
  • Dehue, T. (1990). De regels van het vak: Nederlandse psychologen en hun methodologie 1900-1985. Amsterdam, Van Gennep.
  • Dykstra, P. (2004). “Het zit in de familie. Oratie ter gelegenheid van de aanvaarding van de leerstoel Verwantschapsdemografie aan de Universiteit Utrecht.” Bevolking en Gezin 33(1).
  • Dykstra, P., M. Kalmijn, et al. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study. A multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships. NKPS Working Paper 1. The Hague, NIDI.
  • Dykstra, P., M. Kalmijn, et al. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study. A multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships. NKPS Working Paper 2. The Hague, NIDI.
  • Ebeling, W. and R. Feistel (1990). Evolution of Complex Systems. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
  • Ebeling, W., Karmeshu, et al. (2001). “Dynamics of Economic and Technological Search Processes in Complex Adaptive Landscapes. Advances in Complex Systems.” Complex Dynamics in Economics, Guest Editors: D. Helbing, F. Schweitzer 4(1): 71-88.
  • Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. B. Cronin and D. Shaw. Medford, NJ, Information Today. 36.
  • Fishwick, P. A. (1995). Simulation, model design and execution. Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall.
  • Foot, K. A. and S. M. Schneider (2002). “Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46(2): 222-244.
  • Fox, R. G. (2000). Hearing where we´re coming from – Ethically and professionally. Ethics and Anthropology. 925: 1-8.
  • Fry, J. (2003a). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication on the Web: a case study of corpus-based linguistics. Digital Resources in the Humanities 2003 (DRH) conference., Cheltenham, England, 31st August ? 3rd September, 2003.
  • Fry, J. (2003b). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication within academic specialisms. Brighton, University of Brighton.
  • Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Galison, P. and D. J. Stump (1996). The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. P. Galison and D. J. Stump. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge. New York, Basic Books.
  • Gilbert, N. and K. G. Troitzsch (1999). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.
  • Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical Ontology: Harvard University Press.
  • Hey, T. and A. E. Trefethen (2002). “The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid.”Future Generation Computer Systems 18(8): 1017-1031.
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London, Sage.
  • Hine, C., Ed. (forthcoming 2005). Virtual Methods, Berg.
  • Hockey, S. (2000). Electronic texts in the Humanities: principles and practices. Oxford, Oxfor University Press.
  • Howard, P. (2002). “Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New organizations, new media, new methods.”New Media & Society 4(4): 551-575.
  • Joerges, Bernward, and Terry Shinn. 2001. Instrumentation between science, state, and industry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kamermans, H. (forthcoming). “The Application of Predictive Modelling in Archaeology: Problems and Possibilities.” CAA Proceedings, 2004.
  • Kamermans, H., J. Deeben, et al. (2002). Deconstructing the crystal ball: the state of the art in predictive modelling for archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands. Enter the Past. The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage. K. F. B. Ausserer, W. / Goriany, M. / Karlhuber-Vöckl, L. Oxford, Archaeopress.
  • Kircz, J. (2004). E-based humanities and e-humanities on a SURF platform. Utrecht, Stichting SURF.
    KNAW (2004). Call for Program Leader.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
  • Lewis, M. (2000). The new new thing: A Silicon Valley Story. New York, Norton.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2000). “A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” The Journal of Science & Health Policy 1: 43-48.
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2002). “The Communication Turn in the Theory of Social Systems.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19(2): 129-136.
  • Mason (1996). “Moving Toward Virtual Ethnography.”American Folklore Society Newsletter 25(2): 4-6.
  • Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience. Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
  • Newman, S. (1998).”Here, there and nowhere at all: distribution, negotiation and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering.” Knowledge and Society 11: 235-267.
  • NWO (2000). Een digitale bibliotheek voor de geesteswetenschappen. Den Haag, NWO, Gebiedsbestuur Geesteswetenschappen.
  • NWO (2001). Geesteswetenschappen Strategienota 2002-2005. Den Haag, NWO.
  • NWO (2001). Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen 2002-2005. Den Haag, NWO.
  • NWO (2002). Culturele vernieuwing en de grondslagen van de geesteswetenschappen. Den Haag, NWO.
  • Poster, Mark. 2001. What is the matter with the Internet? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ratto, M. and A. Scharnhorst (2004). From numeric to metaphoric simulations – attempts to draw a simulation landscape. Paper given at Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation. A Cross-Disciplinary Workshop. Koblenz, Germany, July 1-2, 2004.
  • Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press.
  • RISSH (2004). Blueprint for the European Research Observatory for the Humanities and Social Sciences EROHS. Copen Hagen, The Danish Research Agency.
  • Rousseau, R. (1997). “Sitations: an exploratory study.” Cybermetrics 1(1): http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html.
  • Scharnhorst, A. (1998). “Citation-Networks, Science Landscapes and Evolutionary Strategies.” Scientometrics 43(1): 95-106.
  • Scharnhorst, A. (2001). Constructing Knowledge Landscapes within the Framework of Geometrically Oriented Evolutionary Theories. Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Sciences Systems Science 2000. M. Matthies, H. Malchow and J. Kriz. Berlin, Springer: 505-515.
  • Scharnhorst, A. (2003). “Complex Networks and the Web: Insights from Nonlinear Physics.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8(4).
  • Schweitzer, F., Ed. (2002). Modeling complexity in economic and social systems. New Jersey, World Scientific.
  • Slater, D. (2002). “Making things real – Ethics and order on the Internet.” Theory Culture & Society 19(5-6): 227-+.
  • Slevin, James. 2000. The Internet and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • SWR, (2003). Networked Data Services: Towards a Future Data Infrastructure for the Social Sciences in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, KNAW: 40.
  • Thelwall, M. (2001). “A Web crawler design for data mining.” Journal of Information Science 27(5): 319-325.
  • Thelwall, M. (2002). “Methodologies for Crawler Based Web Surveys.” Internet Research: Electronic Networking and Applications 12(2): 124-138.
  • Van den Daele, Wolfgang, Wolfgang Krohn, and Peter Weingart. 1977. Geplante Forschung: Vergleichende Studien über den Einfluss politischer Programme auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  • Vann, K. (2004), “On the Valorization of Informatic Labour”, Ephemera, vol. 4(3): 246-266.
  • Van Tilburg, T. and E. De Leeuw (1991). “Stability of scale quality under different data collection procedures: A mode comparison on the ´de Jong Gierveld Loniless Scale´.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 3: 69-85.
  • Wallerstein, I., J. Calestous, et al. (1996). Open the Social Sciences. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • Walsh, J. P. and N. G. Maloney (2002). Computer network use, collaboration structures and productivity. Distributed work. P. Hinds and S. Kiesler. Cambridge. MA, MIT Press: 433-458.
  • Wang, X. F. 2002. “Complex networks: Topology, dynamics and synchronization.” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 12:885-916.
  • Ward, K. J. (1999). “Cyber-ethnography and the emergence of the virtually new community.” Journal of Information Technology 14(1): 95-105.
  • Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, NY, Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D. J. (1999). Small Worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
  • Weingart, P. (1974). On a sociological theory of scientific change. Social processes of scientific development. R. Whitley. London, Routledge: 45-68.
  • Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Wouters, P. (2000). Exploring the future of information and communication in Research. AVRIL NIWI Research Programme 2000-2004, , Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Wouters, P., A. Beaulieu, et al. (in preparation 2007). Mediation, distributed inscriptions and networked knowledge practices: STS meets the challenge of the internet. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman, MIT Press.
  • Wouters, P. and P. Schröder (2003). Promise and Practice in Data Sharing. Amsterdam, NIWI-KNAW.